drawing what i can from that table, it seems FWood is best in class among it's contemporaries, for almost any category were it weighted. And since all bows draw time is equal, the equivalence is that much greater in a way. While also amplifying the the finer differences. No one of them is a particularly swifter striker, which brings it to damage and/or range. The FWood nearly sips stamina in comparison to the greaters. And seeing how the reticle acuity 'seems' to be the same for all. Anyone who's played knows the crude is trash. Seemingly there is very little difference with them technically. But how they play in the field is another matter entirely. I would not trade back for the crude from my FWood. Not today or tomorrow. With some updating the 1M drift is perilous with the FWood. Which stands to reason. Knowing at what frequency this occurs would granularize it, or how often is it forced to miss. Do they all weight 1.5? that would be one final type of conditional, in addition to durability. Start(max). Do they always maintain the same weight through upgrading? And one last thing comes to mind is the status of a movement debuff, had any of them not had it that would make it a bit more valuable. granted the single -5 does not debuff. Since it's rounded down.

For example if the FWood had a 2sec draw, that would account for some other shortcomings easily.
We should be able to make compound versions of them, albeit crude ones, not modern pulleys and such. But sophisticated enough to make a lesser and greater version of these weapons.