Vault Traveler replied to Type of game, content, early access, longevity and sustainability of Valheim September 17, 2021 @ 11:49:39 pm PDT

Originally posted by LordOfTheBread:
Originally posted by Vault Traveler:
I never understand how people can be mad about a game where they can get 100h and more good time out of 17 bucks.

Sure more is better, but I bought Doom 2016 and had 80h with (thanks to) snap map for 60 bucks, and Doom Eternal only 25h for 90 bucks, in comparison.

Not every game must be the new WoW, Fortnite or whatever. Sometimes its good how it is and every step back is regretable but also each step forward is mentionable.

So teh fact that the game was relatively cheap (and pretty good for an Early Access) means its shielded for criticism forever?

That's flawed logic.

Also your comparison with Doom Eternal is flawed, both games offer vastly different experiences and it is silly to just look at a game and divide its price by the number of hours you spend playing.

Did I say that? Critism as much as you want.

I used Doom as example that not huge teams and impressive tech makes me happy, the game was a huge letdown, it has inferior gameplay loop and lots more crashes then doom 2016 and even valheim.

There is no flawed logic, I simply impressed my feelings about the situation, people expect stuff get disapointed and start looking for blood.

Most critism is linked with absymal behavior, they do not care for a good solution they simply want to hate against something, venting and other childish behavior.

Its always the lazy devs, always cashgrab, always evil intention.
8:13 am, September 18, 2021
Vault Traveler 0 comments 0 likes