Originally posted by Ryzilynt:

Originally posted by Anarchist Jurisdictor:

You realize your argument basically amounts to saying that early access products are disfunctional and we have no reason to ever expect them to be more than that in any profferred amount of time? It's essentially victim blaming. Oopsie, silly us, we thought that Iron Gate either had some kind of reasonable understanding of what they could accomplish in a year or would at least be honest on their storefront. Hopefully in 2022 we don't make the same category of mistake again so that we don't have blatantly unfinished games begging for game-of-the-year accolades and hysterical posters on the forums calling people entitled.

No , my argument "basically" amounts to exactly what i stated. The game has been out of EA for 10 months. They have provided a bunch of effort (not going to post the same partial list again). Over 10 million people purchased and adored the game, and rated it with "overwhelmingly positive" both currently and all time. AND It won game of the year.

All of this despite the infinitesimally small percentage of players that want to come here and ♥♥♥♥ on the dev team because they deem progress unsatisfactory based on an arbitrary sliding scale they themselves can only loosely define.

Madness. But feel free to continue. You are entitled to your opinion. You are just not entitled to the 97% of the rational player base agreeing with you or even remotely endorsing your opinion.

Enjoy.

Majority seem to be of the same mind.... updates needed. It's only a handful here staunchly defending the Developer.

As to the initial rating is nothing more than a red herring, where it is now compared to release after this length of time would be amusing if not for the fact it cost money to buy.

Also critique is not "♥♥♥♥ on the dev", it is asking where is the progress promised by the developer. No customer made them claim to work further, the developers did when they sold it to us.